Saturday 3 August 2013

Pyramid of Power in Organization


A pyramid organizational structure is a hierarchy with the executive level at the top and descending levels from middle management to the lower levels of the organization. The idea behind the structure is that each upper level is able to function because of support from the lower portions of the pyramid.
The primary concept of the pyramid organizational structure is that the lower levels of the organization follow the commands of top level employees. In essence, the executives control all key elements of the company. This includes strategy, operations, and overall vision.
There are typically three major levels in pyramid organizational structure: executives, managers, and staff. Managers usually oversee specific departments or products and report directly to the executives. Staff supports managers by performing tasks that fulfill the directives coming from the executive level. Some organizations may have an assistant manager level between managers and staff.

Functional structure is one of the most traditional models of organizational structure. It divides responsibility by job title. A typical chart outlining this system would have the president or CEO of the company on top and all other positions listed below.

Workers in a pyramid organizational model have a well-defined structure for career advancement. The common path is to move from staff level to manager and executive.
But newer models of organizational structure reject the notion put forth by the pyramid system that the leader of an organization should have complete control over important decision making. They give more responsibility to employees by allowing greater control on a departmental level. This is primarily in response to criticism that executives on the top level of an organization do not have the same understanding of specific departmental issues as the employees who work daily in these areas.

4 comments:

  1. Good thinking on Pyramid.. Pyramids structures can be created TWO ways.. 1. One level over other.. 2. Cris corss method.. In the class it was shown that 4 pieces by using them cris cross one can make excellent structure.. That is the important take away..

    I expect you to discuss these two methods .. why one is good over the other and how it is good..?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Professor Prasad for the feedback. Unfortunately I could not see the comment before coming to class. Anyways from what we discussed, I could decipher the following conclusions :
      1. Its quite easy to have simple horizontal separation between individual levels in hierarchy but the real power of pyramid comes when the separation is slanted and there is mix of levels. The intersections of horizontal and vertical lines represent employees who simultaneously serve both a division and department.As employees from different departments come together to tackle these projects, interdepartmental communication and coordination improve.This results in slanted lines and a 3D matrix.
      2.There can be two types of pyramids possible:
      a. top to bottom flattens
      b. Upside down in this it flattens bottom to top.
      Both the structures have its advantages and disadvantages.

      Delete
  2. Good... Managers create their own structures given the company that they handle.. It is upto them how innovatively they do this. Pyramid just beginning .. no body knows where and what type of structures are created for achieving a given purpose.

    Good to see that you picked up this.. dr mandi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly sir..the type of structure needed for a situation varies according to the requirements and goals of the team. It is upto a creative and able manager to devise and come up with effective structure suitable to the scenario.
      This is what we all are trying to achieve through lectures like these that we become more creative and can think out of the box for better results. Thank you Dr. Prasad

      Delete